Bucking the popular view of tabloid journalism as bad journalism, Orenbring argues this style of sensational content plays an important role in the formation of an alternative public sphere. It juxtaposes itself in relation to mainstream journalism by presenting different issues, forms and appeals to an audience not regularly served. By tracking the history of the development of tabloid journalism, Orenbring hopes to shed a new light on this form and on mainstream journalism. Often the debate around tabloid journalism is simplified into a binary argument: serious, responsible, good-quality journalism versus sensational, oversimplified, populist journalism. Yet, going back to the earliest days of the mass circulation press (and in some cases before) it is possible to see examples of titillating stories, mainly around scandal, crime and courts. Continue Reading →